Anemia and iron deficiency in pregnant women with rheumatic diseases.

INTRODUCTION: Anemia and iron deficiency are the most common pathologies in pregnancy and associated with adverse pregnancy outcome. As patients with rheumatic diseases are also at high risk for anemia, we aimed to investigate the frequency of anemia and iron deficiency during pregnancy in this group and whether anemia is a risk factor for adverse maternal or child outcome. METHODS: We analyzed 368 pregnancies from a German registry for pregnancies in patients with rheumatic diseases (TURIRE) from 2014-2022. Anemia and iron deficiency were defined according to the World Health Organization. Main outcome measures were prevalence of anemia, iron deficiency, and adverse outcomes. RESULTS: From the 368 patients 61% were diagnosed with a connective tissue disease, 16% with rheumatoid arthritis or juvenile idiopathic arthritis, 14% with spondyloarthritis, 3% with vasculitis and 7% with other. Prevalence of anemia/iron deficiency was 18%/28% in the first, 27%/51% in the second and 33%/62% in the third trimester. Low hemoglobin levels (OR 0.52) or iron deficiency (OR 0.86) had a negative impact on child outcome. However, lower hemoglobin levels were associated with a lower risk for maternal complications (OR 1.47). CONCLUSION: Prevalence of anemia and iron deficiency is high in pregnant women with rheumatic diseases. Compared to previously published cohorts of the general population from different countries, the prevalence of anemia and iron deficiency is distinctly higher. Furthermore, patients with rheumatic diseases already start with impaired iron storage and/or hemoglobin levels. Thus, iron supplementation should be initiated early on in this vulnerable in this patient group.

Digitally-supported patient-centered asynchronous outpatient follow-up in rheumatoid arthritis - an explorative qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: A steadily increasing demand and decreasing number of rheumatologists push current rheumatology care to its limits. Long travel times and poor accessibility of rheumatologists present particular challenges for patients. Need-adapted, digitally supported, patient-centered and flexible models of care could contribute to maintaining high-quality patient care. This qualitative study was embedded in a randomized controlled trial (TELERA) investigating a new model of care consisting of the use of a medical app for ePRO (electronic patient-reported outcomes), a self-administered CRP (C-reactive protein) test, and joint self-examination in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. The qualitative study aimed to explore experiences of RA patients and rheumatology staff regarding (1) current care and (2) the new care model. METHODS: The study included qualitative interviews with RA patients (n = 15), a focus group with patient representatives (n = 1), rheumatology nurses (n = 2), ambulatory rheumatologists (n = 2) and hospital-based rheumatologists (n = 3). Data was analyzed by qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Participants described current follow-up care as burdensome. Patients in remission have to travel long distances. Despite pre-scheduled visits physicians lack questionnaire results and laboratory results to make informed shared decisions during face-to-face visits. Patients reported that using all study components (medical app for ePRO, self-performed CRP test and joint self-examination) was easy and helped them to better assess their disease condition. Parts of the validated questionnaire used in the trial (routine assessment of patient index data 3; RAPID3) seemed outdated or not clear enough for many patients. Patients wanted to be automatically contacted in case of abnormalities or at least have an app feature to request a call-back or chat. Financial and psychological barriers were identified among rheumatologists preventing them to stop automatically scheduling new appointments for patients in remission. Rheumatology nurses pointed to the potential lack of personal contact, which may limit the holistic care of RA-patients. CONCLUSION: The new care model enables more patient autonomy, allowing patients more control and flexibility at the same time. All components were well accepted and easy to carry out for patients. To ensure success, the model needs to be more responsive and allow seamless integration of education material. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was prospectively registered on 2021/04/09 at the German Registry for Clinical Trials (DRKS00024928).